CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it....

To: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it....
From: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:30:34 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
That is kind of the point. Washington, DC is not a state either. Let's leave 
well enough alone.

Jack Brindle, W6FB


On Dec 24, 2010, at 3:42 PM, George Fremin III wrote:

> The mults for the naqp are states.  I don't think Campbell, CA is a separate 
> state from CA.
> 
> --
> George Fremin III
> 
> 
> On Dec 24, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com> wrote:
> 
>> And make Campbell, CA a mult also. I'd really like to be on the "chased" 
>> side of things for a change...
>> 
>> Jack Brindle, W6FB
>> 
>> 
>> On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote:
>> 
>>> Good choice.  While we're at it, how about adding Washington, D.C. as a 
>>> multiplier?  

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>