As you may know, I am a great believer in "let them play" under only minimal
rules, but I do not support the idea that a "super station" should be
allowed to control two QRGs within a single band segment, ie., two run
stations in the same band.
73, de Hans, K0HB
-----Original Message-----
From: Jukka Klemola
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 8:39 PM
To: Radio K0HB
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-op rule change in CQWW
59!
Jukka
2011/8/18 Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>:
> Yes, I support that rule.
>
> 73, K0HB
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Jukka Klemola Sent: Thursday, August 18,
> 2011 6:58 PM To: Radio K0HB Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-op rule change
> in CQWW
>
> Hans,
> Please let me get this .. are you happy about this?
>
> That is great !
>
>
> 73,
> Jukka OH6LI
>
> 2011/8/18 Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> 12. When two or more transmitters are present on a band, either a
>>> software or hardware device MUST be used to prevent more than one
>>> signal at any one time; interlocking two or more transmitters
>>> on a band with alternating CQs (soliciting contacts) is not allowed.
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|