Francisco,
While I am certain that the ARRL told you that the internal CT licensing
issue you raised was something they could not do anything about, I am even
more certain that they did not tell you that "they couldn't care less".
I believe the "couldn't care less" is your biased interpretation of the fact
that the ARRL has no influence over Portuguese licensing issues.
73,
Bob W5OV
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Francisco Costa,
CT1EAT
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 4:31 PM
To: k5zd@charter.net; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: [RRDXA] E73M - I have cheated
Hi Randy
> The best way to help is to report your suspicions, or
> better, to provide evidence. These "suspicions" are
> very helpful to the sponsor in knowing where to look
> for more information.
I respectfull desagree.
Some years ago I had the hard decision to complain
about another CT station (due a violation of national
issuing special calls rules).
For the fisrt time I made a complain to a contest sponsor.
I couldn't belive when I read the reply. They simply
said that was an internal CT issue, and they couldn't
care less. That was my 1st, only and last complain.
In case you are wondering, the contest sponsor was ARRL.
73 F.Costa, CT1EAT
http://ct1eat.no.sapo.pt
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|