CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS QSO RATES!

To: geoiii@kkn.net, w5ov@w5ov.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] BOGUS QSO RATES!
From: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 09:24:01 -0500 (EST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree that judicious use of not IDing is good technique.

To me  judicious means:

1.  Only after a quick, in tempo exchange. Not  after the other guy has 
sent his exchange with his J-38. You need to let the  pileup that you want 
things at your speed, not his.

2.  Not  after an exchange involving fills, corrections, etc.

3.  Never more  than 3 qsos without your call.


73  -  Jim  K8MR
 
 
 
 


In a message dated 11/8/2011 6:05:21 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
geoiii@kkn.net writes:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 01:08:08PM -0500,  w5ov@w5ov.com wrote:
> 
> While many stations don't send their  callsign often enough, I think that
> with a little observation, you will  find that those on the top of the
> listing do, in fact, say their  callsign with every qso. Have you ever
> heard N5TJ run a pileup without  saying his callsign?

The stations at the top of the listing do not always  sign their call
after every contact.  N5TJ does not always say his call  after every 
contact. 


> To do otherwise is simply poor  operating.

I do not agree.

> 
> Those who argue against  signing their call with every qso simply don't
> know what they're talking  about.

I still think this is the definitive respones to this  topic:

http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/1998-07/msg00386.html

--  
George Fremin III -  K5TR
geoiii@kkn.net
http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>