[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Aniother rules/remote RX issue

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Aniother rules/remote RX issue
From: Dave Lawley <dave@g4buo.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 00:11:17 +0100
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm sorry, I had to go back and read this several times in case I was 
missing something. The I went and checked the calendar to make sure it 
was not April 1st.

This, to me, is so self-evidently a "no", it is hardly even worth asking 
the question. How can a single operator unassisted imagine it is ok to 
use a remote receiver in another continent to check if the run frequency 
is in use?

Dave G4BUO

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Pete Smith N4ZR"<n4zr@contesting.com>
> To: "reflector cq-contest"<CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 11:35 AM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Aniother rules/remote RX issue
>> I was at a multi-multi this weekend, and one of the ops asked this
>> question:
>> I know that I can't use a remote receiver, even from a multi-multi, for
>> example to catch weak Europeans on 160,  But what about using one to
>> check and see if your run frequency is clear in your target area?  Is
>> that against the rules?
>> I thought this was a pretty easy "yes" but the other guy seemed
>> unpersuaded, so I thought I'd crowd-source the answer.
>> 73, Pete N4ZR

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>