To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW shortened deadline: some stats |
From: | "Marijan Miletic, S56A" <s56a@bit.si> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:11:53 +0200 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
KR2Q wrote: No offense intended to ARRL, just a data point for comparison. I brought first 8? diskette to ARRL HQ in 1988, many 5 ½? ones were sent later until emails were accepted. My stats include several logs lost at CQ, none at ARRL. I am not sure shorter submission period would improve processing quality although I support it. Even with the present internet technology we could log live in the clouds but that would be too much for traditionally conservative hams. LP MMM S56A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Log Submission Time, jpescatore |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Log submission time, Chuck |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW shortened deadline: some stats, Radio K0HB |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW shortened deadline: some stats, Mirko S57AD |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |