CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] [N1MM] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections

To: Ron Notarius W3WN <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [N1MM] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections
From: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 22:41:48 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Ron,

Some folks don't care for this because VE3 has always been a sort of free pass 
--- "VE3 = ON".  Now they'll actually need to COPY something.

73, Hans, K0HB



On Aug 8, 2012, at 9:47 PM, "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net> wrote:

> Oh, OK, let's see if I follow you:
> 
> Selected ARRL contests have always used ARRL sections as multipliers.
> 
> When the old ARRL Canadian Division became the CRRL, and then merged into
> the RAC, the Canadian CRRL/RAC sections were used as multipliers for these
> same selected contests.
> 
> RAC this year has decided to split the old Ontario section into 4.  Which
> means, by default, the selected ARRL contests that have always used sections
> now have a net gain of 3.
> 
> Exactly what here is a poor decision by the ARRL?  Because it appears from
> here that the ARRL made no decisions -- and didn't have to, just stay with
> the same defaults they've always used.
> 
> Now, if the ARRL had decided not to recognize the change in status for
> Ontario, would we now be reading the same complaints about the appearance of
> a change in procedure?  (rhetorical question)
> 
> Much ado about nothing!
> 
> 73. ron w3wn
> Believe in Zoltan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve London
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:39 PM
> To: N1MMLogger@yahoogroups.com; CQ Contest
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [N1MM] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections
> 
> So, let me get this straight....
> 
> RAC splits Ontario into 4 sections, but won't use those sections in RAC
> contests.
> 
> ARRL (which is independent from RAC) does use those new sections in ARRL
> contests.
> 
> Sorry, but I continue to believe that this is a poor decision by the ARRL.
> Maybe 
> it should be reconsidered by the ARRL Board of Directors at their January
> meeting.
> 
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
> 
> On 08/08/2012 09:45 AM, Tom Haavisto wrote:
>> No
>> 
>> They will only appear in contests that use ARRL sections.  RAC Canada Day
>> and Winter contests use provinces as mults.
>> 
>> Tom - VE3CX
>> 
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ted Edwards
> W3TB<w3tb.ted@gmail.com>wrote:
>> 
>>> **
>>> 
>>> 
>>> May I also assume that these sections are also used in Canadian contests
>>> such as the Canada Day events in December and July 1st?
>>> 
>>> I had anticipated -- incorrectly -- that they would appear at Field Day
> and
>>> trained our new operators to watch for them.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 73 de Ted Edwards, W3TB and GØPWW
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>