CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP

To: Mike Tessmer <k9nw@qth.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP
From: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:53:36 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The mults in NAQP are US states, Canadian provinces and north American 
countries. 

DC is not a state. 

The rules do mention DC and say that it counts as MD for this contest.

--
George Fremin III


On Aug 10, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Mike Tessmer <mtessmer@mindspring.com> wrote:

> With this talk about new sections/multipliers, I think what NN3W may have 
> hinted at is:
> 
> Why is DC not a multiplier in the NAQP?
> 
> I asked this same question a few years ago and got exactly one answer that 
> implied that adding DC might render all NAQP records meaningless, or 
> something to that effect.  That's a very weak argument in that having someone 
> show up from DC would have no more effect on any record than having someone 
> show up from Greenland or any Caribbean or Central American country.  (Yet 
> we'd all be saying "Great to see some DX activity!"}
> 
> So I'll toss it out there again:
> 
> - Why not add DC as a mult in NAQP?
> - What would be a valid reason not to?
> 
> Perhaps one of the NAQP managers might chime in.
> 
> 
> 73, Mike K9NW
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>