Off topic a bit but N1EN's post struck a chord.
Just for kicks I performed a RBN spot search for my call and the following
spots came up during a period of time that I was QRT. I did not operate at
all on Sunday. Interesting....perhaps the skimmers misinterpreted a like
call sign?
de dx freq cq/dx snr speed time
K3LR K1ZR 28005.3 CW CQ 13 dB 32 wpm 2042z 17 Feb
K3LR K1ZR 14046.6 CW CQ 24 dB 31 wpm 2014z 17 Feb
KM3T K1ZR 14046.6 CW CQ 15 dB 33 wpm 2011z 17 Feb
VE2WU K1ZR 14046.6 CW CQ 20 dB 31 wpm 1927z 17 Feb
K8ND K1ZR 21006.9 CW CQ 8 dB 32 wpm 1743z 17 Feb
NY3A K1ZR 28062.4 CW CQ 28 dB 31 wpm 1654z 17 Feb
K2DB K1ZR 7020.5 CW CQ 10 dB 29 wpm 0855z 17 Feb
K2DB K1ZR 7020.4 CW CQ 11 dB 30 wpm 0753z 17 Feb
K3LR K1ZR 3510.3 CW CQ 26 dB 29 wpm 0207z 17 Feb
-Shane
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Michael Adams
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 3:00 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Cheating in ARRL using the cluster
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:27 PM, <w5ov@w5ov.com> wrote:
> A lot of this seems to be the Skimmer/RBN network reporting the station
> the runners are working.
>
> Probably not anyone cheating in the manner you describe.
>
> I found this a LOT. (Among all the other busted calls).
>
>
One datapoint to support this: I just looked up my call at RBN. It
appears that I was spotted 30 times this weekend.
However, I was 100% S&P during the contest. I did not call CQ at all this
weekend.
--
*Michael D. Adams* (N1EN)
Poquonock, Connecticut | mda@n1en.org
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|