CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?

To: "'Barry'" <w2up@comcast.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?
From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:09:42 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I see.  Thanks Barry.

There are those of use who operate in the contest, but do not submit logs
for any of a variety of reasons.  

I guess our opinions aren't important then.  

Pity.  This used to be one of my favorite contests, too.

73
 
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Barry
Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 6:27 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?

My invitation said it was sent to those who submitted a log.  If you 
submitted a log and didn't get one, you're not paranoid; they really are 
out to get you :-)
Barry W2UP

On 3/9/2013 14:23, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
> Is this survey by invitation only?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Bob
> Naumann
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 8:16 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?
>
>
> The survey is to collect opinions on this and other questions.
>
> Complete the survey and make your opinion count!
>
> 73,
> W5OV
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Kim
> Östman
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 2:34 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?
>
> Hi,
>
> I just took the CQWW survey, and one question in particular sparked a
> further question:
>
> What is the origin and rationale for the CQWW rule where North American
> stations get 2 points for intra-continent QSOs instead of just 1 point,
> which is the case for all other continents?
>
> I honestly don't know the answer, and find this exception to be very
> strange. To see the idea about raising it to 3 points I find even
stranger.
>
> 73
> Kim OH6KZP
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>