| To: | "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 579 |
| From: | "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com> |
| Reply-to: | Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:48:52 -0700 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
----- Original Message ----- From: Zack Widup I thought I saw somewhere that in order to consider a QSO valid, you had to exchange callsigns and one other piece of information. Hi Zack. I remember reading that also. Does that mean that stations that run without giving their callsigns for 5 minutes are violating the rules and should be DQ'ed? 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 579, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] The question unasked ..., Scott Robbins |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 579, John Unger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 579, David Pruett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |