I thought ignorance was supposed to be bliss!
73 John N5CQ
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Paul O'Kane
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 1:59 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote contest operation
Over the last few days, this thread has included the terms listed below.
I don't recognise amateur radio contesting in any of them. Most are
technical terms specific to the internet, a public communications utility.
Whatever relevance the internet has to contesting in general, in remote
contest operation it serves only to replace or displace amateur-band RF
between contesters.
Those who choose, or are obliged, to get on the internet before they get on
the air are doing something fundamentally different from the rest of us.
We're all entitled to do what we please, but we're not entitled to do what
we please and call it what we please. Internet-dependent contesting is not
the same as amateur-band-RF- all-the-way contesting, even when the operators
at the far end can't tell the difference and when contest sponsors ignore
the difference.
Read, and despair :-)
VPN
packet-loss
delay-spikes
traffic prioritisation
network path
audio-streaming
intermediate server
restrictive ISPs
peer-to-peer
client download
participating client
firewall
port restrictions
server and client
public IP
VPS
encrypted traffic
packet inspection
throttling
dropped packets
latency issues
56mb download speeds
routing
incoming packets
ADSL
fail over to 3G
Skype
cyberworld
jitter
realtime audio over UDP
4G LTE connection
traffic shaping issues
point-to-point microwave
local service provider
73,
Paul EI5DI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|