CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW

To: Edward Sawyer <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX CW
From: Steve Bookout <steve@nr4m.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 16:13:02 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
So, looking at it from the other side, if you bully your way thru a contest, 
doing the types of things described previously in this thread, it makes you a 
great contester that others should use as a role model?

73 de Steve, NR4M



On May 30, 2013, at 13:58, "Edward Sawyer" <SawyerEd@Earthlink.net> wrote:

> In a contest (not to be confused with normal casual operating), doesn't the
> "frequency" defined as a defined bandwidth of spectrum actually, like 7001.0
> +/- 150hz or something, actually belong to whoever can run on it?  I mean if
> someone comes on "my frequency" even if I protest, and starts getting calls
> and I don't, guess who owns it now??  This is from a low power op who has
> lost a lot of frequencies.defended more..and sneaked into a few.  Its just
> like the "left the frequency to work a mult" discussion.  If a frequency is
> being utilized.its being possessed.  If its not producing, its vulnerable.
> And no one jumps on a frequency of someone running a pile.
> 
> 
> 
> If the above statements are offensive to you.then realize you are not a
> competitive contester, in my opinion.  You can still have lots of fun as a
> casual contester or a "budding contester" but if you can't run with the
> dogs.just realize it.  And you might want to avoid the bottom 25khz of the
> bands in the majors.
> 
> 
> 
> I often transmit on 2 antennas and I listen on both.yes.splitting 100 or
> 150W.amazing but true.
> 
> 
> 
> Ed  N1UR
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>