CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote

To: <CQ-Contest@CONTESTING.COM>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote
From: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:04:31 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
If you remote across borders, don’t you need at a minimum the proper license to do that?

Where is the difference to being there in person?

New rule proposal: for all remote contest operations, have the operator submit evidence of proper licensing, similar as is done for DXCC approved operations, you have to prove you had permission to operate a station from the location/country you remote to. And also prove that you really operated a remote station located where you claim it is located.

What's the difference to being there in person? Why don't you demand that evidence from DXpeditions being (or claiming to be) there in person? What makes them more trustworthy?

73, Olli - DH8BQA
Smlining more and more with every new post on the topic ... ;-)



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>