CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse beacon of my own call?

To: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse beacon of my own call?
From: "Hans Brakob" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:28:28 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Morse truly is just another data mode.  It was designed to be copied by 
machines.


Sunnuvagun!


dit dit


de Hans, K0HB

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> wrote:

> On 24/07/2013 18:16, Radio K0HB wrote:
>> If using a local decoder causes some newcomer to dabble in CW and in 
>> contesting, then I see no reason for a prohibition.  You and I won't 
>> be required to use them, and the dabbler will likely jump in once he 
>> realizes the limitations of machine decoding.
> And if using a third wheel causes a newcomer (who can't
> balance on two) to dabble in cycle races, then I see every
> reason for prohibition - because all they do is get in the
> way of the competitors who are prepared.
> Seems to me that knowing CW is a prerequisite for anyone
> expecting credit for a CW QSO.  Those who consider CW to
> be just another data mode will likely disagree.
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>