CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision?

To: "Martin , LU5DX" <lu5dx@lucg.com.ar>, "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision?
From: "Milt -- N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:44:23 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
You want to make it better.

Distance scoring RULES.

A meaningful exchange, ie. Grid Square for base scoring.

Also, the band difficulty should be weighted for scoring which would also encourage more activity on the lesser used 'edge' bands.

Also, the power levels should be weighted a la SPDC such that all scores can have somewhat of a direct comparison. Awards would still be by category, but scoring could be directly compared by HP to LP to QRP.

Mis dos centavos, de Milt, N5IA

-----Original Message----- From: Martin , LU5DX
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2013 4:24 AM
To: CQ-Contest
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision?

SNIP

Even more. It would encourage for example EUs to be more active on 10 m
during solar minimun to make as many intra-continent Qs as possible.
It would encourage SA stations also to make as many intra-continents Qs on
160 and 80, bands that right now show a very little activity from this part
of the world.

SNIP

Vy 73.

MM LU5DX.



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3629/6876 - Release Date: 11/28/13

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>