CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:07:11 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Oh well,
Maybe he should think when a dupe does call to say who he is, otherwise naxt time through the band i'll waste his time some more by calling him again. his loss.

Joe wb9sbd
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 6/25/2014 10:40 PM, Doug Renwick wrote:
The problem comes when you don't know his call.  If he says you are a dupe,
you still don't know his call.  If you can coerce his call at the time of
the exchange ... fine.  If you can't then you have to wait and wait for him
to id or constantly say 'what's your call?" until he does.  I guess the last
resort is assume the cluster report is correct and log it that way ...
sorry, I thought everybody had an eye on the cluster.

Doug

"Think of all the ways you can hurt yourself laughing."

-----Original Message-----
Agreed,

I use a two call rule.

When I find a station to work, if I know his call and not a dupe, great!
if i don't,, I'll call anyway, and if he's a dupe his loss of time, too
bad,, say who you are.

And at any rate be I know who it is or not, I call and only try twice if
I do not get them in two tries. I move on, either the pile is too big or
propagation isn't good enough. and try again later, on the next pass
through the Band.

Joe WB9SBD


---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>