CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Entry Class -- CQWW Classic Overlay As It Should Be

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Entry Class -- CQWW Classic Overlay As It Should Be
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 11:00:31 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
As one of those who has advocated a 24-hour class for CQWW for well over a decade, I was gratified last year when Randy announced the Classic overlay. My enthusiasm was somewhat dampened, though, when the final rule banned spotting assistance as well as SO2R.

I imagine that these restrictions were added to allay the concerns of the 48-hours-at-any-cost types, but they strike me as unnecessary. This year, I will be entering what I prefer to call the Classic-As-It-Should-Be category, with spotting assistance from the RBN (of course). I am not using SO2R simply because I am no longer set up for it, but otherwise I intend to adhere to the Classic rules. I think it will be an interesting tactical challenge to try to maximize my score, give my location and antennas, operating within those limits. True, there'll be no certificate in it for me, but that's secondary.

Want to join me? Should Classic be changed next year to eliminate these restrictions?

--

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>