CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 10/15 interaction

To: Randall K Martin <rkmassoc@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 10/15 interaction
From: Tod <tod@k0to.us>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 12:53:18 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Randy, 

My guess is that 1) will do the job. 

2) will only  improve things if the undesired 15m signal is on the outside 
shield of the coax. In that case the choke might work at the station end and 
save you a trip up the tower. 

I agree  that 4) is not a solution to run after. If you do however, contact me 
-- I have been curious about how well K3's might work. A used pair might be 
interesting to test.

A bit of additional information-

 I used my AIM4170 to scan the frequencies of interest on the feed line after 
the stub. That allowed me to be certain that the stub did not negatively affect 
the VSWR at the desired frequency. I could also see when the length of the stub 
produced the maximum effect on 15m impedance. I did not even measure the 
physical length of the stub -- I just found a length that seemed to do the job 
according to the scan and when I tested it running the amp it clearly was 
working.

73, Tod, K0TO




Sent from my iPhone 6


> On Nov 6, 2014, at 11:33 AM, Randall K Martin <rkmassoc@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> Wow,
> 
> Thanks for all the quick responses. Here is a summary of what I've heard so 
> far.
> 
> 1) I am already using coax stubs on both the 10M and 15M feedlines, and I 
> believe these are working. I do not have a 15M reject stub on the 10M feed, 
> so this is a good suggestion and I will try it.
> 
> 2) Kelly VE4XT had a good suggestion to add a choke balun on the 10M yagi in 
> addition to the standard KLM balun that is already in place to see if this 
> will help. The 10M feedline runs down through the plane of the 15M yagi. WX 
> is nice here and I can easily try this.
> 
> 3) There may be less interaction when the yagis are 90 degrees from each 
> other, but in almost all situations, I am pointing them in the same 
> direction. Also, my goal is to eliminate the HI RFI problem from happening in 
> any scenario.
> 
> 4) Getting rid of the K-3's is not something I would consider.
> 
> 5) The antennas are both 6 element KLM big stickers, both with standard KLM 
> feed baluns of that era.
> 
> 73 Randy K0EU
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>