CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 10:46:27 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Just wondering here, How would the log checkers know?

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 12/12/2014 8:45 AM, K4XS via CQ-Contest wrote:
Better to ask the log checkers.
However, when I operated from KH6 and had a packet pileup, some well known
unassisted guys would show up on a pretty regular basis.  Just  chance?
Only they, and the log checkers know for sure.
K4XS In a message dated 12/12/2014 2:41:38 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
Ktfrog007@aol.com writes:

How widespread is this practice?  Everyone talks about it but I've  never
heard any statistics.
Given human nature, I assume the worst, too, but some real data would be
better.
Everyone talks about alien abductions, too. 73,
Ken, AB1J
In a message dated 12/12/2014 14:26:38 GMT Standard Time,
cq-contest@contesting.com writes:

If it  wasn't an advantage, why would  so many guys
use it and then claim  single op  unassisted?

K4XS




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>