| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted? |
| From: | VE5ZX <ve5zx@hotmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:57:58 -0600 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Most easy with the busted calls in unassisted logs for example With the improving accuracy of RBN spots (Thanks Pete and others) soon one will have to look for increased accuracy not a decreased accuracy as an indicator of cluster use. Perhaps we are already there. Does anyone know? Syl - VE5ZX _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting without spotting, Steve London |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting without spotting, Radio K0HB |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?, Peter Voelpel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?, Trent Sampson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |