CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Need clarification from DL1MGB

To: David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Need clarification from DL1MGB
From: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 19:20:48 +0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Same reflection Dave...

Thanks for making it clear again :)

We will see if Chris confirms that interpretation of the rules.


73 de Mats RM2D

2014-12-16 19:01 GMT+03:00 David Siddall <hhamwv@gmail.com>:
>
> LOL.  It was "clear" to me until I saw Sinisa's answer.  My answer is that,
> for the stated scenario, assisted gets 1000 points and unassisted gets 714
> points.   73,  Dave K3ZJ
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:14 AM, shristov <shristov@ptt.rs> wrote:
> >
> > 4O3A <4o3a@t-com.me> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > *Assisted scores are compared against Unassisted scores.
> >
> > > If someone make in CQWW as unassisted - 10 points
> > > Another guy make in same contest as assisted - 14 points
> > > What are final scores for WRTC qualification?
> >
> >
> > Rules are very clear on this.
> >
> > Assuming top unassisted score of 10 points,
> > unassisted guy gets 1000, and assisted guy gets 1400.
> >
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Sinisa  YT1NT
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>