CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology

To: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking Technology
From: Andy Melanin <ua3dpx@mail.ru>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 20:04:37 +0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Jeff,
Russians have 1000 W legally!!
It was long time ago when we had 200 W limit.
Just for information 
73! Andy UA3DPX / RM3F
Legal power holder :-))

Отправлено с iPad

> 6 мая 2015 г., в 17:56, Jeff Clarke <ku8e@bellsouth.net> написал(а):
> 
> To answer N2IC's question...
> 
> Maybe my statement about contest cheating and people not being caught might 
> be a little strong, considering I don't personally don't have any evidence. 
> But consider the following:
> 
> 1. Do you truly believe that those Italian stations that give you 300 watts 
> as their power are really running that much power? A case could also be made 
> for countries like G, PA etc where I think the limit is 400 watts. Plus 200 
> watt Russians with big signals.
> 
> 2. Just about every DX contest there are many EU stations with wide signals 
> spattering all over the place or with key clicks or an image of their signal 
> on the band they are operating on. On the DQ list for CQWW CW there are only 
> three stations caught for this? Plus only one for SSB?
> 
> 3. No one caught for transmitting two signals in  SO category. I find that 
> had to believe. I guess everyone who has a lockout has perfected their system?
> 
> 4. Go on Google and search "ham radio contest cheating". You will find plenty 
> of blogs that discuss cheating that goes on in EU.
> 
> So I have lots of suspicions but no hard evidence. I'm pretty sure CQ doesn't 
> investigate many things unless someone complains to them. That would make 
> sense considering it's all volunteer's.  Also, I would imagine they probably 
> do go thru entries whose scores are off the charts when compared to to their 
> competition with all resources that are available. Also for close finishes in 
> a category to make sure they get it right, much like what they do for WRTC.
> 
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>