I am amazed at most of this,
not surprised (I am not that naive), disappointed mainly
it used to be all Hams were trusted to a high degree
A hand shake or word of declaration on a contest entry
was a bond that was respected, sacred
For many of us it still is !!!
It appears with the level of suspected activity
and then the Big Amp story by the "IJ0"
that the fact some of our fellow contest OPS have stooped to the Dark Side
This saddens me, ticks me off and makes me wonder if I should really pursue
building my new contest station in North Texas.
And even DXing has it's Dark Horses
Do I really want to pursue a new hobby, No !!!
So I will build my new station and continue to chase DX
and when I get frustrated take a break
and go brush hog the back 50 acres
After all the majority of us do play within the rules and within the
My Ham Radio Friends
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Gerry Hull <email@example.com> wrote:
> Sunshine is the best remedy. The single best act Randy has done is making
> the logs public.
> Now, crowd sourcing of log review is a pretty simple effort.
> SDR + RBN + crowdsourcing: pretty much no way to hide this type of
> Gerry W1VE
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Roberts, Will <
> Will.Roberts@duke-energy.com> wrote:
> > If someone was feeding calls to TO7A to try and have him disqualified,
> > wouldn't these have likely been picked up by an SDR somewhere? As I
> > reading in these posts, there were no SDR records found for these QSOs.
> > This is probably the main evidence that Randy and the CQ committee used
> > prove the cheating.
> > 73,
> > Will AA4NC
> > Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:39:19 +0100
> > From: "Stewart GM4AFF" <firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com>>
> > To: "'CQ-Contest Reflector'" <firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:
> > email@example.com>>
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle
> > Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:
> > email@example.com>>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> > Could be that someone is trying to stitch up Dimitri by feeding the
> > We have seen this before.
> > Stewart
> > GM4AFF
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest mailing list