Sig,
It's even easier.
--
Your SSB signal is barely understandable". It sounds overly processed. QSL?
--
Your message is explicitly clear, you use the Q code and you force the other
party to acknowledge receipt of your message.
73,
Vlad VE3IAE
--
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 4:26 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Q-Signals for Contesting
Vlad how about a signal SSB so processed it's barely understandable?
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 5/12/2015 8:21 AM, V. Sidarau wrote:
> For whatever reason some people still want to see a Q code message
> while there is a well established RST report system.
> Now:
>
> 1. If there is a new (NEW, unfamiliar yet) Q-code message, who would
> properly read it on the fly and react accordingly?
>
> 2. OK, you want a Q code. Here you are.
> UR RST 596
> UR RST 596
> QSL?
>
> 73,
> Vlad VE3IAE
>
> --
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf
> Of Charles Harpole
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 12:14 AM
> To: VK4TS Trent Sampson
> Cc: oz1fao@osa.dk; Mike Reublin NF4L; jimk8mr@aol.com; CQ Contest
> Subject: [Bulk] Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting
>
> On CW, if I got a 576, I know to look for something wrong; I do not
> need specifics from the sender... he already made my having a problem
clear.
>
> On phone, I just say "Your audio is distorted or you are splattering"
and
> the offender that I can hear usually in one hop goes right on offending.
> Oh well.
> Charly HS0ZCW
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:05 AM, VK4TS Trent Sampson
> <vk4ts@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
>> RST - Readability Strength Tone
>>
>> Give them a real signal report
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf
>> Of Mike Reublin NF4L
>> Sent: Tuesday, 12 May 2015 4:44 AM
>> To: jimk8mr@aol.com
>> Cc: oz1fao@osa.dk; CQ Contest
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Q-Signals for Contesting
>>
>> Let's not beat around the bush.
>>
>> QSS
>>
>> 73, Mike NF4L
>>> QCS? Q - Crappy Signal ? Other suggestions?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 73 - Jim K8MR
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
> --
> Charly, HS0ZCW
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|