[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Q-Signals for Contesting

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Q-Signals for Contesting
From: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 14:43:53 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
>On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 8:37 AM, Joe <nss@mwt.net> wrote:
>Vlad how about a signal SSB so processed it's barely understandable?
Obviously you give them more than "5" on the "readability" rating to indicate 
they "turned the processing knob to 11"
59 = perfect audio69 = slight over-processing, some syllables lost
99 = loud but unintelligible


CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>