CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ'ing for Dollars

To: Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com>, George via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>, <ncphotos@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ'ing for Dollars
From: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 08:04:40 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'm not entirely sure that attaching a raffle to a radio contest turns us
into professional radio operators any more than playing Texas Hold-em at the
local Oddfellows Lodge turns people into Daniel Negreanu.

But... While I might disagree with Hans on the reasoning, I'm not sure I
disagree with him on the overall idea of "hurling it aside with great
force."

It is one thing to tell the 90 per cent of us who don't live on the Atlantic
Rim "it's just for fun, compete among your peers" while the K1s and PJ4s and
EA8s rack up win after win when the only thing at stake is fleeting bragging
rights and an overpriced hunk of walnut. It is quite another to tell people
"Please pay to enter my contest, but know that you'll only win one of the
radios if you're lucky enough to be geographically blessed."

Without some kind of handicapping system to even out geographic disparity, I
suspect the response of most hams outside the blessed zones would be words
unsuitable for a family venue such as CQ-contest. And I suspect the
operators who did pay would, and perhaps should, be ignored by the rest of
us.

Now, if you had a sponsor and didn't have an entry fee, then I wouldn't see
this as any different from when the Bermuda QSO Party awarded a trip to
Bermuda to the winner.

73, kelly
ve4xt




On 6/4/15 7:44 PM, "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:

> This idea should not be tossed aside lightly.

It should be hurled aside with
> great force.

We are Radio Amateurs (not Radio Pros), just a bunch of boys and
> girls 
playing exuberantly in the ether, in sort of a worldwide "National Park
> of 
the Airwaves".

If you want to play radio for pay, join the Navy and go to
> sea on a 
destroyer as a Radioman.  Don't pollute Amateur Radio with "CQ for
> Dollars".


73, de Hans, K0HB
--
"Just a boy and his radio"?
--
Proud Member
> of:
. ARRL - http://www.arrl.org
. RSGB - http://www.rsgb.org
. A1 Operators -
> http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
. Minnesota Wireless contesters -
> http://www.W0AA.org
. Arizona Outlaws contesters -
> http://www.arizonaoutlaws.net
. Twin City DX Assn - http://www.tcdxa.org
.
> Minnesota Amateur Radio Technical Society - http://www.mn-arts.org/
. Lake
> Vermilion DX Assn - http://www.lvdxa.org
. Royal Naval Amateur Radio Society -
> http://www.rnars.org.uk/
. SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
. CW Operators Club ­
> http://www.cwops.org
. SKCC - http://www.skccgroup.com/
--

-----Original
> Message----- 
From: ncphotos@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 8:12
> PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest,
> Vol 150, Issue 6

Would anyone be interested in a contest that you had to pay
> a $20 entry fee?
I am still working on the rules.
1-10 place would get a HF
> radio for there prize as long as I get enough 
operators enter the contest to
> cover the cost of the prizes it should
> work.


Charles,
W2CSI,
W2CSI.com


Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE
> Smartphone


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest
> mailing 
> list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq
> -contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>