[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Popularity

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Popularity
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:01:34 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I'd admit it. I am not the rag chewer I used to be. But I do have on the wall a Rag Chewers Certificate hanging on the wall. I don't think you can even get them anymore at all do you?

They were a cool program where the recipient can not ask for it. But a person that had a nice 30 minute or longer contact with the person would "Nominate" them for the award. It would arrive totally un expected. Fun Stuff. And Free. Now days it would probably cost ya 10 bucks.

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
On 12/22/2015 5:42 AM, Jukka Klemola wrote:
I find that people are VERY interested in a few repeating themes on the HF
bands these days:


There is much less old time ragchewing unless its 40M, 80M, and 160M in
which case there is still a lot - especially the free flowing roundtable
type.  Just ask anyone who routinely CQs on 80 or 40M SSB.  There is also
some very consistent net activity that doesn't full crowd up the bands but
is there - religiously.


If you think the bands are too quite - try CQing.  Its rare to not get a
call - and usually a string of them - for an "average" contester set up.

Ed  N1UR

As I see this, the people wanting to discuss shortwave radio matters,
contesting in particular, those rag chewers have QSYed to internet email

Here we are. One big group of contesters rag-chewing about contests until
our own favorite contest is on.
Then we return to the net.

Jukka OH6LI
CQ-Contest mailing list

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>