| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey Results - part 2 |
| From: | "James Cain" <jamesdavidcain@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Dec 2015 15:27:17 -0000 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I am shocked by the votes on "Remove Uniques?" Who could oppose removing uniques, which are, as CQ's official comment says, obviously busted call signs? If I bust anything in a contact, and it's indisuptable from log-checking, I want the sponsor to remove the contact. Period. K1TN _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey Results - part 2, Mark van Wijk, PA5MW |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey Results - part 2, James Cain |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey Results - part 2, Bill via CQ-Contest |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey Results - part 2, Charles Harpole |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |