CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Are you a Clueless Cluster Clicker?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Are you a Clueless Cluster Clicker?
From: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:56:44 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Mike,

> The floor is yours.  Justify your actions!

I don't do this, so nothing to justify from my part. For entertainment purposes only. :^)

> Are you just too lazy

I don't think laziness alone explains it.

> Are you a Clueless

Getting warmer. Let's use the JX case you mentioned. The software will give the entity's name, but how many people could find it on the map? Propagation, time of day etc, won't 'register'.

Other crazy theories are:

The cluster has thousands of users, if there was no correction, it must be right;

Poor hearing/I can't believe my ears;

Herd mentality;

WFWL;

The list could go on.

Expand this behavior to all other human endeavors, and you could explain why the world is SNAFU. But now we're getting off-topic. LOL

73 de Vince, VA3VF

On 2017-03-07 2:37 PM, Mike Tessmer wrote:

This past weekend I listened to an exasperated S54ZZ on 80m tell caller
after caller "We've worked before, we've worked before" all because he was
erroneously spotted as S51ZZ.  He'd give his call....and the guys just kept
calling.  And when he'd tell them they had already worked they'd just say
"59 <state>".  VE3DZ/6Y2T (BY2T) and the P40R (PV0R) ops both noted over 500
dupes in the CW contest - all because of erroneous cluster spots.  The
erroneous spots are bad enough, but what is worse (pathetic, really) is the
large number of the regular, high scoring multi-op stations and
assisted/unlimited stations that feed these piles - guys who have been
around for a long time, and presumably might have a clue.  Plenty of other
"calls" made the highlight reel this past weekend:  JX5J (ZX5J), TT3Z
(TO3Z), FK0N (5K0N), FJ2T (PJ2T)



The question is why?  Why do you just blindly pounce on any spot without
considering whether or not it's likely that is really the call on frequency?
Are you just too lazy to process that it's unlikely that there would be a
station QRV in JX, in the middle of winter, with a commanding signal on 15m
beaming southeast?  Are you just too lazy to question a loud, clear BY on
40m, beaming south, when it's high noon in Beijing?  Are you just too lazy
to question the likelihood of a really loud TT3 station, again beaming
south/southeast...you know, because there's such a plethora of activity from
TT that they now issue special prefixes for the ARRL DX contest?



Are you a Clueless Cluster Clicker?



The floor is yours.  Justify your actions!



(Please spare us the lectures on how/why occasional dupes may occur.  That
is NOT AT ALL what is happening here.)





73, Mike K9NW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>