CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT

To: "n2ic@arrl.net" <n2ic@arrl.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] HOGGING COEFFICIENT
From: Matt NQ6N <matt@nq6n.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 16:18:15 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Steve,

While it's true that sometimes two stations will listen on the same
frequency, I don't think this happens intentionally. It most likely a
scenario where neither is able to generate rate and so the conflict goes
unnoticed (or the same callers are naively entered in both logs for a
while).

Aside from that situation, I think split operations (particularly by big
stations who *are* able to generate rate) occupy twice the spectrum of
single frequency operation.

Tangentially, I've found that most of the frequency holding power one has
over a run frequency is due to the callers, not the running station's
signal. The neighbor encroaching on the frequency may not hear me loudly,
but if he hears my callers he'll move away.  Odds are that some of my
callers are loud enough to disrupt his too-close run frequency even if my
signal is not.

At any rate, this is an interesting discussion.

73,
Matt NQ6N




On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 2:03 PM, Steve London <n2icarrl@gmail.com> wrote:

> In your example, you are never transmitting on 7050. In fact (and often
> reality), several CQers could all be announcing their listening frequency
> as 7050. In addition, there is nothing to stop a DX station from CQing on
> 7050.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
>
>> On 4/8/2017 5:48 AM, Matt NQ6N wrote:
>>
>>> If the concern is bandwidth used, shouldn't split operation be banned
>>> as well? How does same band dueling CQ use more bandwidth than
>>> "listening on this frequency and 7050"?
>>>
>>> In both cases it is the activity triggered by the running station on
>>> both frequencies that prevents those frequencies from being used by
>>> someone else.
>>>
>>> Not arguing for banning either, just pointing out that if bandwidth is
>>> the concern they are essentially identical examples of "hogging" a
>>> scarce resource.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Matt NQ6N
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>