CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Request to publish all calls of stations found to be br

To: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Request to publish all calls of stations found to be breaking any rule in all contests
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 22:46:38 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Bravo, Mike. Let me extend the thought a bit further. The CQWW Committee needs to be transparent and specific about its criteria for various actions. What warrants a warning, versus what warrants a DQ? What repeated infractions from one year to the next warrant a DQ?

The old yellow card/red card system was an attempt at this. Nobody is asking *how* they caught the cheaters, just what the penalties are for various offenses, either current or repeated. That's the only way they will get pastthe perception that they are being arbitrary, favoring a particular nationality and so on.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

On 4/13/2017 7:25 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
CQ chose only to publish stations that were Disqualified.

How about a list of all stations that were found to have broken a rule(s) and the penalty for doing so.

How about a lot more transparency.

Just a thought.

W0MU



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>