The DARC system has done precisely this for several years.
All DARC contest logs are accepted as QSO proof for the DARC Awards programme
"Contest is more than 59 - that is known especially by award hunters. With more
than 2000 active German stations in WAG there be not many DL-awards for which
WAG does not allow for additional valuable contacts. And DARC's online QSO
database and QSLing system DCL (DARC Community Logbook) allows for paperless
application for about 30 German awards. DCL also shows you your personal score
for each of the available awards based on your QSOs in DARC contests (which are
imported after crosscheck) and QSOs you have added via adif."
http://dcl.darc.de/~dcl/public/index.php
This was used as a partial model for the Wireless Institute of Australia (WIA)
Awards Programme that accepts LOTW and EQSL Confirmations as well as
traditional hard copy. As yet direct contest QSOs have not been included.
http://www.wiaawards.com/
Regards
Trent VK4TS
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tim
Shoppa
Sent: Thursday, 27 April 2017 3:53 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com; Pete Smith N4ZR
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Encouraging Casual Participation in Contests
Pete writes:
> There is a reasonably simple and straight-forward way to encourage
> more
of this, potentially
> yielding more people for us to work. We need interconnection between
> CQ
and ARRL contest
> databases, so that any contact that is in both stations' log in a
> given
contest can be claimed for
> ARRL and CQ award credit without going through the QSL card process.
> I'm not underestimating the programming effort involved, I hope, but
surely some
> combination of volunteer and professional staff involvement can get it
done. It could start
> small - perhaps a pilot involving the CQWW open log database and DXCC.
Imagine the
> value added to LOTW if it were the hub for this process, and the
potential increase in
> DXCC fees. Surely, this is a win-win proposition.
For a little while in the 1960's or 1970's, the ARRL DXCC desk would give you
DXCC credit for a ARRL DX contest QSO if you gave them the QSO details and they
still had the DX's paper contest log available to cross-verify. So there is
some precedent for this. Although they discontinued this ability probably due
to the PITA of keeping paper contest logs around.
The majority of high-volume contesters use LOTW today so I'm not really sure
it's necessary.
There are even spotting clusters that will tag known LOTW users with [LOTW]. I
wonder if CQ log statistics could show that LOTW users work more weak-ass
in-search-of-DXCC-credit callers than the non-LOTW users.
Tim N3QE
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|