CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Wireless Headphone System

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Wireless Headphone System
From: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 14:06:34 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Been using the same old Radio Shack cordless headphones my wife bought me
about 10 years ago.  Analog type with no latency in the audio.

Just set them on the charger base when not using them and they are always
ready to go.  She paid $29.95 for them.  Best $29.95 she ever spent on me!
:-)

They have big muffs that are real comfortable to wear.  And the best part
is that I can take my hearing aids off and adjust the volume to where it is
comfortable without the 'aids.  73
Tom W7WHY

On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 6:29 AM, Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net> wrote:

> Don’t forget: quality always costs less in the long run.
>
> What are the odds the cheapo unit posited has the Pin 1 problem?
>
> How many cheap units do you go through before you decide to do what you
> should have done in the first place? Which is, of course, to pony up for
> quality… For those who asked about a “quality” unit, $200 is not too much.
>
> 73, kelly, ve4xt,
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>