CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 4U1WB: ARRL DX Contest: Rule 6.1

To: sawyered@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 4U1WB: ARRL DX Contest: Rule 6.1
From: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:52:37 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The logic that one cannot improve one’s callsign demand is flawed because
many use different callsign in WPX. In fact you use AC1U. If they were to
truly make it “fair” they would require everyone to use their own everyday
callsign. But of course they wouldn’t because the rare prefixes are what
makes the contest interesting.

More examples:

KP, KH or KL station operating in CONUS. Some casual ops might think they
are from their call areas.

OR an extreme example - if Martti Laine decided to operate stateside or
even remote with his personal call AH3D (Johnston island) this would be
perceived as an unfair advantage?

I don’t even see 4U1WB beating out most of the top 10 anyway and a lot of
the top 10 don’t have rare prefixes.

The fact that 4U except UN and ITU is counted as host country is a quirk of
the DXCC and CQ DX lists.

Ria
N2RJ

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:44 AM Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:

> You can put in the effort to improve antennas and location.  But no matter
> how much effort you put in, you can’t make up a call sign like 4U1WB.  It
> has to be bestowed on you.
>
>
>
> In the ARRL DX contest – its of no value – in fact its clearly a
> hinderence.  Being right, but having to repeat and explain is a contest
> killer.  But in WPX, no one cares where you are (other than wondering why
> the points for the Q don’t look right), they just know they need a new
> prefix.  Add that to the fact that some percentage of callers probably
> think they just worked a new one (4U1 must be UN HQ no?) and its just not
> good sportsmanship in my opinion.
>
>
>
> 4U1WB and any other 4U1 should compete for NA not for W.
>
>
>
> 73
>
>
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
>
>
> *From:* rjairam@gmail.com [mailto:rjairam@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 15, 2018 8:26 AM
> *To:* sawyered@earthlink.net
> *Cc:* cq-contest@contesting.com
> *Subject:* Re: [CQ-Contest] 4U1WB: ARRL DX Contest: Rule 6.1
>
>
>
> Fair? Nothing is fair... might as well require everyone to operate with
> the same antennas and location while you’re at it.
>
> Ria
> N2RJ
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:23 AM Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Masa, Why don't you just get a W3 call sign and avoid this mess?  You will
> never be competitive in ARRL DX having to explain who you are.  I am sure
> that many DX stations would be very happy to work a W3 from DC.
>
>
>
> As to WPX, a 4U1 callsign is clearly an advantage in a Prefix contest.  It
> does  not seem fair to me that a 4U1 can compete equally with a W1 in the
> WPX contest.
>
>
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>