It's hard to disagree with you, Peter.
Yuri VE3DZ
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Peter
Sundberg
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 1:53 PM
To: CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RBN Announcement on FT8 Spotting
Let it rip.
Who cares any more as FT8 is about computers talking to computers while the
operator is doing
- or has his mind - on other things. Ham Heaven is here according to the masses
and apparently statistics. RBN is all about computers anyway.
And we must make decisions based on statistics - right?
To be able to make use of the FT8 "Deep"
functionality the computer needs the info to decode unknown callsigns that are
"22 dB below the noise level".
So why not feed the computers with as much info as possible to speed up the
journey up the DXCC ladder. Then, when the barn is full, some operators might
even return to real ham radio again without concerns over what is fed to the
RBN network.
73
Peter SM2CEW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|