CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending 'test'

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending 'test'
From: Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:27:35 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It allows to discern whether the callsign just heard as tailend belongs to the CQ-ing station = to be called after "test" or belongs to someone calling the CQing station = not to be called (when no "test" heard)

Of course only relevant to those operating unassisted and therefore not knowing the callsign of the frequency owner.

Omitting "test" is time saving at the expense of unassisted operators.

73 Chris DL8MBS

P.S.: Now  awaiting LY5W's fierce attack on his pet peeve ;-)


Am 27.11.2018 um 19:48 schrieb Chris Tran GM3WOJ:
Hello all


I was puzzled as to why many stations waste time by still sending ‘CQ <callsign> 
Test’ i.e. the stock macro from most of the contest software writers.

73   Chris
GM3WOJ / GM2V



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>