CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting
From: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:59:08 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I am not sure how many people are aware of a new FT mode that was just 
released.  The mode called FT-4 has a few new features.

The first is that its quicker by trading S/N capture algorithm for speed of 
contacts.  I read somewhere there is a 10db price to pay on the weak signal 
capability.

The second is it allows for more flexibility of contest exchanges.

The third is disturbing.  It allows for an automated feature that decides the 
best contact available of the decoded possibilities (like a new mult) and just 
goes for it automatically.  The operator doesn't click on the call, the 
operator clicks on the desire to find the best call.

Because of the simplistic possibility of having a screen macro just keep 
clicking on "find the best call", a feeble attempt to thwart full robotic 
capability is made to swap the button on the screen with the cancel button.  
Although this is NOT done after every QSO but only after "a few QSOs" whatever 
that means.  So even with this attempt, the acceptance of a few automated and 
optimized QSOs has been declared acceptable.  Just not 100% fully robotic.  
Although whether this attempt to move buttons actually prevents a macro from 
engaging the button is not assured to me.  People more knowledgably on such 
things can comment.

I hope that the Contest community is watching this slippery slope slide.  Fire 
up FT4, decode the signals in the pass band, Automatically find a few and work 
them without the operator even knowing which ones are being worked.  Seriously, 
what is the point?  If a robot war contest is desired, I am all for it and 
think it's a cool concept.  But we don't put 6 year olds in the ring to fight 
with robots in robowars and we shouldn't be mixing the two in contesting either.

Contesters ignore this disturbing trend and acceptance by sponsors at their 
peril in my opinion.

73

Ed  N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>