DXing and grid chasing is different from contesting I would argue.
In my experience most of my contesting experience has been part of a
rover team. FT8 has changed the dynamic some, but we've found that SSB
and CW are far more productive for contests for two reasons - one is
the time to completion, and the other is that you can't ask people to
QSY on FT8. SSB and CW are still far superior for that.
Maybe it will change it for fixed stations, I suppose.
73
Ria, N2RJ
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 19:42, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/30/2019 10:03 AM, rjairam@gmail.com wrote:
> > I’ve used FT8 in VHF contesting and it’s a mixed bag. I doubt that it will
> > take the place of SSB or CW.
>
> I'm primarily a CW op, and have been for 55 years. I'm also quite active
> in the grid chase on 6M, and until two years ago, found CW best by far
> for picking up multi-hop E-skip. I picked up 80 new grids last season,
> all but a few using FT8. A handful used MSK144 (meteor scatter). I made
> no CW or SSB contacts on 6M last season, and very few the season before.
>
> FT8 has been a game-changer for grid-chasing on 6M and DXing on 160M.
> Two reasons: 1) ops who don't know CW can activate a grid with a mode
> that can work 6-10 dB deeper into the noise than CW with great ops on
> both ends, and 20 dB better than SSB; 2) the mode concentrates all
> activity into a 2.5kHz window with a multi-decoder. No need for
> waterfall displays or constantly tuning the band.
>
> Before JT65 and FT8, it took me eight years to work four JAs on 6M CW.
> This season I worked more than 60 JA in 23 grids, plus JT and DU.
>
> In the four years prior to the 160M season just finished, I heard no EU
> at all. This season I worked one of the four CW stations I heard. Using
> FT8, I worked more than 20 EU stations, 11 of them new countries.
>
> Things may be different east of W9, but that's life from W6.
>
> That said, I have no interest in WSJT modes for HF contesting.
>
> AD6E put it quite well on the NCCC reflector, saying that he loves
> contesting both for the station-building and the operating. I feel the
> same way, and have the greatest respect for those contesters, like NCCC
> members K6XX, W2SC, and N6KT, who do both.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
Ria Jairam, N2RJ
Director, Hudson Division
ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio™
+1.973.594.6275
https://hudson.arrl.org
n2rj@arrl.org
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|