The beauty of contesting is that there are so many different ways to
contest, even within a single contest there are many ways to compete.
If you want to go fully unassisted, by all means you can do that. If
you want to use cluster and skimmer, by all means you can do that.
If you want to go low power (as you've done for many years), by all
means. If you want to use big stacks, kilowatts of power, by all
means.
I don't also understand the aversion to robotic contesting, when so
many even CW contesters use ESM in N1MM. Enter the callsign, press
enter, enter, enter, basically same as WSJT auto-sequence. Red and
green spots show up in the bandmap. Ctrl Alt up and down to pick off
mults.
I understand some are afraid of change, but if you really look at it,
contesting today is vastly different even from the 60s and 70s.
73
Ria, N2RJ
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 07:57, Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com> wrote:
>
> I am not sure how many people are aware of a new FT mode that was just
> released. The mode called FT-4 has a few new features.
>
> The first is that its quicker by trading S/N capture algorithm for speed of
> contacts. I read somewhere there is a 10db price to pay on the weak signal
> capability.
>
> The second is it allows for more flexibility of contest exchanges.
>
> The third is disturbing. It allows for an automated feature that decides the
> best contact available of the decoded possibilities (like a new mult) and
> just goes for it automatically. The operator doesn't click on the call, the
> operator clicks on the desire to find the best call.
>
> Because of the simplistic possibility of having a screen macro just keep
> clicking on "find the best call", a feeble attempt to thwart full robotic
> capability is made to swap the button on the screen with the cancel button.
> Although this is NOT done after every QSO but only after "a few QSOs"
> whatever that means. So even with this attempt, the acceptance of a few
> automated and optimized QSOs has been declared acceptable. Just not 100%
> fully robotic. Although whether this attempt to move buttons actually
> prevents a macro from engaging the button is not assured to me. People more
> knowledgably on such things can comment.
>
> I hope that the Contest community is watching this slippery slope slide.
> Fire up FT4, decode the signals in the pass band, Automatically find a few
> and work them without the operator even knowing which ones are being worked.
> Seriously, what is the point? If a robot war contest is desired, I am all
> for it and think it's a cool concept. But we don't put 6 year olds in the
> ring to fight with robots in robowars and we shouldn't be mixing the two in
> contesting either.
>
> Contesters ignore this disturbing trend and acceptance by sponsors at their
> peril in my opinion.
>
> 73
>
> Ed N1UR
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
--
Ria Jairam, N2RJ
Director, Hudson Division
ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio™
+1.973.594.6275
https://hudson.arrl.org
n2rj@arrl.org
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|