CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Distributed Contesting

To: "pokane@ei5di.com" <pokane@ei5di.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Distributed Contesting
From: K8MR via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 13:41:37 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
All remotes are not the same. There's a huge difference between a 
rent-a-superstation in Maine remote vs. a guy who lives in a condo or deed 
restricted community who puts up his own remote station. AD8J in Asheville, NC, 
comes to mind. 
And are not the remotes in Maine all competing against each other, and not 
against ordinary stations back in Ohio or California or wherever?


73  -  Jim   K8MR


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Tue, Oct 6, 2020 4:46 am
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Distributed Contesting



The advantage lies in having remote capability.  If this occasionally 
seems unfair, then having a separate category for remotes could make it 
fairer.

 >  Why can't the WWROF take a leadership role in making recommendations to
 >  overhaul the category structure used by the hundreds of smaller contest
 >  sponsors (and the few larger ones)?

K5ZD, a Director of WWROF, said earlier in this thread - "I don't think 
this is something that WWROF can assist with."

73,
Paul EI5DI


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>