| To: | <ct-user@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | CT and IC-736 or IC-738? |
| From: | ken@packetclustr.com (Ken Wolff) |
| Date: | Wed, 01 Mar 95 07:40:38 -0500 |
I haven't tried those radios. If the ICOM address is settable, they will probably work with one of the existing selections. 73 de K1EA k1ea@packetclustr.com -- Submissions: ct-user@eng.pko.dec.com Administrative requests: ct-user-request@eng.pko.dec.com Problems: reisert@eng.pko.dec.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | CT and IC-736 or IC-738?, frenaye@pcnet.com |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | CT and IC-736 or IC-738?, ken silverman |
| Previous by Thread: | CT and IC-736 or IC-738?, frenaye@pcnet.com |
| Next by Thread: | CT and IC-736 or IC-738?, ken silverman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |