I never had a problem with the FT1000MP in SS. I was running CT in DOS
mode, not a DOS window. Are we sure the problem isn't the windows vs
DOS issue?
KE7X
Fred Cady
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department
Montana State University
Bozeman, MT 59717
(406) 994-5976 (406) 994-5958 (Fax)
fcady@ee.montana.edu
> ----------
> From: Keith Beebe[SMTP:kbeebe@epix.net]
> Reply To: Keith Beebe
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 6:33 PM
> To: Ken Wolff
> Cc: mrtoburen@sprintmail.com; CT-User
> Subject: Re: [ct-user] "Stutter" in transmitted CW
>
>
> In my case it's a Yaesu FT-990 if that's helpful for another
> reference..
>
> Thanks Ken for looking into this. I also appreciate the many comments
> from others
> on the reflector.
>
> We await the next version.
>
> 73 de Keith Beebe W3KB
>
>
> Ken Wolff wrote:
>
> > CT9.37 has gone to full duplex on the COM ports. That means CT will
> send and
> > receive simultaneously on the RS232 lines. Based on this, I think
> the 1000D
> > (and others) can't handle RS232 send, RS232 receive and CW sending
> > simultaneously.
> >
> > I now need to interlock CT to stop sending while data is arriving.
> >
> > - Ken
> >
> > ***************************
> > Ken Wolff K1EA
> > K1EA@contesting.com
> > ***************************
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: MT [mailto:mrtoburen@sprintmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 2:31 AM
> > To: 'Ken Wolff'
> > Subject: RE: [ct-user] "Stutter" in transmitted CW
> >
> > I believe I was running from "real" DOS by selecting the "Restart in
> MS-DOS
> > Mode" from Windows 98. I should have added to my original post that
> I was
> > keying with my Vibroplex paddle using the rig's internal keyer. I
> did not
> > have CT hooked up to key the rig.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ken Wolff [SMTP:K1EA@contesting.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 1998 12:48 AM
> > To: MT
> > Subject: RE: [ct-user] "Stutter" in transmitted CW
> >
> > Were you running in a DOS box under Windows, or "real" DOS?
> >
> > Thanks - Ken
> >
> > ***************************
> > Ken Wolff K1EA
> > K1EA@contesting.com
> > ***************************
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
> [mailto:owner-ct-user@contesting.com] On
> > Behalf Of MT
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 1998 4:48 AM
> > To: 'Hans Brakob'; ct-user@contesting.com
> > Subject: RE: [ct-user] "Stutter" in transmitted CW
> >
> > I definitely had the same problem with CW stuttering. I did not
> realize it
> > until several hours into CW SS. I thought that everyone was getting
> rusty
> > receiving CW -- Hi Hi. Once I figured out the problem, I had to
> disable
> > radio polling to get the stuttering stopped. Later in the contest,
> after
> > the problem was fixed, a half dozen dupe stations called me. It
> seems they
> > must have incorrectly copied my call due to the stuttering!!!
> >
> > I was running 9.37, FT1000D, and Pentium II - 400.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hans Brakob [SMTP:k0hb@juno.com]
> > Sent: Monday, November 09, 1998 1:39 PM
> > To: ct-user@contesting.com
> > Subject: [ct-user] "Stutter" in transmitted CW
> >
> > Switched from v9.31 to v9.37 just before SS.
> >
> > Never seen in previous versions, but 9.37 seemed to sometimes
> > "stutter" on sent CW characters.....
> >
> > Not consistently, but often enough to be bothersome, it would mangle
> > a character by inserting a "mini-pause" between character
> elements...
> >
> > ...for example the number "0" might sound like "MO" because of a
> > little glitch between the 2nd and 3rd dash, or "B" might be sent
> > as "NI". The pause is not enough for a "full" character break, but
> > definitely confusing. On average, I'd say the "stutter" occured
> > once every 10-15 QSO's.
> >
> > I've used v8.xx, 9.20, 9.21, 9.31, and now 9.37. This problem was
> > NOT in these earlier versions I have used on this same computer
> > (a venerable Compaq 486-33).
> >
> > 73, Hans, K0HB
> >
> > --
> > Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/
> > Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
> >
> > --
> > Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/
> > Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
> >
> > --
> > Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
> > Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
> > WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/
> > Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
> Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
> WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/
> Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
>
--
Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ct/
Questions: owner-ct-user@contesting.com
|