Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side

To: "'karlnet@WISPNotes.com'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side
From: Dan Metcalf <danm@suncorstainless.com>
Reply-to: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:42:43 -0400
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Its actually just the TX rate on the interface

Dan Metcalf
Wireless Broadband Systems
dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
781-658-2075
www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Fisher [mailto:fisher@akorn.net]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:18 AM
To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side

> We set the wireless side to 128k because that LIMITS how much data the CPE
> can move onto the wireless network,  (uploading in this case as
> the data is
> coming from the CPE), and then we limit the Ethernet side because this is
> the interface that is used for downloads.
>
> Thus we set a 768k/128k limit through the hardware.


So I thought that when you set the limit on a port, that it was
bi-directional.  Where did you read that it was one direction?  In other
words, when you set the bandwidth limit on the wireless port, why would it
be only one direction?  Why isn't this documented?  Oh, nevermind last.

Bill

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>