Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side

To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side
From: "Bill Fisher" <fisher@akorn.net>
Reply-to: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 03:07:13 -0400
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
So why hasnt anyone answer this question yet?

Bill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> Behalf Of Norm Young
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 2:51 PM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side
>
>
> Dan, I've tried this and I'm seeing some strange stuff.  Like it appears
> that setting the BW limit in either interface sets the d/l speed for the
> customer, with the lowest number predominating.
>
> For example:
>
> wireless=280
> Ethernet=0 (wide open)
> Tested d/l speed=263 kbps
>
> wireless= 130kbps
> ethernet=280kbps
> Tested d/l speed= 123 kbps
>
> wireless= 280kbps
> ethernet= 130kbps
> Tested d/l speed= 123 kbps
>
> It appears that traffic in either direction on these interfaces is being
> limited to the speed set in the dialog.
>
> Anyone else see this?
>
> Norm
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Metcalf" <danm@suncorstainless.com>
> To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 6:42 AM
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side
>
>
> > Its actually just the TX rate on the interface
> >
> > Dan Metcalf
> > Wireless Broadband Systems
> > dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com
> > 781-658-2075
> > www.wirelessbroadbandsystems.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill Fisher [mailto:fisher@akorn.net]
> > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 12:18 AM
> > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Private side vs. public side
> >
> > > We set the wireless side to 128k because that LIMITS how much data the
> CPE
> > > can move onto the wireless network,  (uploading in this case as
> > > the data is
> > > coming from the CPE), and then we limit the Ethernet side because this
> is
> > > the interface that is used for downloads.
> > >
> > > Thus we set a 768k/128k limit through the hardware.
> >
> >
> > So I thought that when you set the limit on a port, that it was
> > bi-directional.  Where did you read that it was one direction?  In other
> > words, when you set the bandwidth limit on the wireless port,
> why would it
> > be only one direction?  Why isn't this documented?  Oh, nevermind last.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>