Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Karlnet] KN Throughput

To: <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
Subject: Re: [Karlnet] KN Throughput
From: "Bob Hrbek" <bhrbek@jagwireless.com>
Reply-to: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:50:44 -0600
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
struck by lightning?   So how do these flashrom units work?  You just have a
small ATX board that boots off a ide flashrom then throw in a few
pci->pcmcia converters?

-bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nate McLain" <nate@ctrail.net>
To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 10:32 PM
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] KN Throughput


> I have a flashrom unit with a 800MHz processor on a 18 mile link and we
get
> about 4-5mbps. I really love my flasrom units. Except when they get struck
> by lightning... :-)
> But who asked huh... ;-)
>
>
> Nate
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> Behalf Of Roger Boggs
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 9:21 PM
> To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> Subject: Re: [Karlnet] KN Throughput
>
>
> In "clean air", you should expect about 5.5Mbps maximum out of this
> configuration
>
> As Charles said, use a flashrom module on a 300MHz or better machine and
you
> should expect to see about 6.7Mbps or better, depending on the equipment
> you're using
>
>
> At 09:06 PM 11/12/02, you wrote:
> >Ap-1000 -> Ap-1000....what should it be?
> >
> >say a 5 mile link, no polling, and say...an SNR on each side of 25 and a
> >signal of -65dbm at each side.  (unamped)
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Kevin Knuth" <kknuth@karlnet.com>
> >To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:00 PM
> >Subject: RE: [Karlnet] KN Throughput
> >
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > The actual throuhput is affected by the hardware as well.
> > >
> > > An RG has a slower processor than an AP-1000 so it will be a bit
slower.
> > > Processor speed is important because of unbundling the superframe
> packets.
> > >
> > > SO- What hardware are you using exactly??( Charles's question from
> >earlier,
> > > he was on the right track).
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > > ____________________________________
> > > Kevin R. Knuth
> > > Business Development Manager
> > > North America
> > > Corporate Office: 614-822-5275 x130
> > > Home Office: 260-424-9690
> > > Cell Phone: 260-402-6086
> > > Email: kknuth@karlnet.com
> > > www.karlnet.com
> > > ____________________________________
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> > > Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:42 PM
> > > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Karlnet] KN Throughput
> > >
> > >
> > > I have a PtP karlnet link at the end of a 10 mile trango link.  The
> >Karlnet
> > > link is about 5 miles and we get about 3.9Mbps but we have a "little"
> > > frensel clearance issue ;)
> > >
> > > NOC--trango~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~KN~~~~~KN  15miles total; 3.9Mbps.
The
> > > best I've ever seen from any 802.11b stuff is 4.5Mbps and that was
like
> a
> > > 3/4 mile shot w/ 24dbi grids on each end.
> > >
> > > -bob
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Nate McLain" <nate@ctrail.net>
> > > To: <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:32 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [Karlnet] KN Throughput
> > >
> > >
> > > > We have links that run 4-5mbps.
> > > >
> > > > Nate
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-admin@WISPNotes.com]On
> > > > Behalf Of John Maxwell
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 7:26 PM
> > > > To: karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > > Subject: [Karlnet] KN Throughput
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Anyone out there know the actual throughput that we can get on a KN
TC
> >PtP
> > > > link?  To this point, I've only seen about 2mbps at the most.  I
> > > understood
> > > > that they could do about 5-6mbps.
> > > >
> > > > Any words of wisdom?
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Karlnet mailing list
> >Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> >http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
> Roger Boggs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>