To: | Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Karlnet] limiting bandwidth |
From: | Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com> |
Reply-to: | Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
Date: | Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:06:02 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com> |
Norm Young wrote:
I've never been able to get that to work. In practice, what I've seen is that in setting the speed on the two interfaces for say, an asymmetrical connection like 256/128kbps, results in both interfaces set to 128k. Thus, so far, what I've seen is that you can bw limit with Karlnet, but only as long as you want symmetrical. For anything else, I use Mikrotik. Hello, This is close to what I have observed. However, I have found that if you set the Ethernet to a lower rate than the 802.11b interface, you will in effect be asymmetrical, however in the wrong direction for most "desired" asymmetrical applications. Note that throughput-limiting methods are quite difficult to implement without causing packet (and therefore application) loss. The fact you can limit inbound traffic with Turbocell is the difficult part of the process. I sincerely hope that someday the issue will be addressed to resolve the upstream limitation methods, which in theory are less difficult to implement. Chris |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Karlnet] limiting bandwidth, Norm Young |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [Karlnet] limiting bandwidth, Kevin Knuth |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Karlnet] limiting bandwidth, Norm Young |
Next by Thread: | RE: [Karlnet] limiting bandwidth, Kevin Knuth |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |