Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] RIP & fail-over

To: "'Karlnet Mailing List'" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] RIP & fail-over
From: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:44:44 -0500
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Ben,

I have been testing this with out success, but in my test case the
uplink is another karlnet system (v4.44)

Have you verified this as working?

Thanks,

Dan


> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
[mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
> On Behalf Of Ben Polson
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 8:07 PM
> To: Karlnet Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] RIP & fail-over
> 
> You leave the default router blank and make sure that somewhere in the
> upstream chain the proper default-information originate option is
enabled.
> RIP will then propagate a default route in the network.  Beware of
older
> versions of the COR/ROR software, though, as they will not pass the
> default
> route properly unless they are the ones with the checkbox to send the
> default routes.
> 
> -Ben.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]On Behalf Of Dan Metcalf
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 4:51 PM
> To: 'Karlnet Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [Karlnet] RIP & fail-over
> 
> 
> Well my problem is this
> 
> 
> If you put a default router IP on the karlnet unit, how does a RIP
> update replace that? for example, my default router is say
192.168.1.1,
> but that link goes down, and now RIP updates are coming on
192.168.2.1,
> is there anyway for karlnet to switch?
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com
> [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]
> > On Behalf Of Bob Hrbek
> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 7:32 PM
> > To: Karlnet Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [Karlnet] RIP & fail-over
> >
> > we are using karlnet but not much of rip.....only where we've used
> karlnet
> > as a microcell and not wanted to create static routes  (yes, I'm
lazy)
> >
> > It really shouldn't matter much what dynamic routing protocols you
use
> > (assuming you set them up right).
> >
> > BGP isn't that hard either.
> >
> > -bob
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>
> > To: "Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@wispnotes.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 6:15 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Karlnet] RIP & fail-over
> >
> >
> > > anybody using karlnet in a network that is multihomed?
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Karlnet mailing list
> > > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Karlnet mailing list
> > Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> > http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> > --
> > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Karlnet mailing list
> Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
> http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet
> --
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


-- 
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>