NA-User
[Top] [All Lists]

[NA-User] Stupid Question?

To: <na-user@contesting.com>
Subject: [NA-User] Stupid Question?
From: k8cc@mediaone.net (Dave Pruett)
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2002 23:38:09 -0500
At 06:55 PM 2/5/02 -0500, Hal Offutt wrote:
>Sorry for the bandwidth, but I am in Japan without my manual and I need to
>email my NAQP CW log in a couple of days.  I am using NA version 10.53.  I
>believe they want Cabrillo format, but I'm not sure how to produce this.  I
>chose the "write log" option when exiting and it wrote out nine files:
>adf, brk, dup, log, 1st, mul, prn, qdf and sum.  I know what all of these
>are except for adf and 1st.
>
>Is one of these files the "Cabrillo" file?

Hal,

The .LOG file generated from any NA version after about 10.42 is a Cabrillo 
file; before that it was the old ARRL .LOG format.

When N5KO was gathering input concerning Cabrillo, I argued for a new file 
extention to uniquely identify Cabrillo files but my suggestion was 
rebuffed.  Never mind that some contest logging programs decided to use 
.CBR or .TXT instead.

In recent versions, the base filename of the Cabrillo file will be the same 
as the .QDF from which it was generated.  Originally, the file was named 
<callsign>.LOG where <callsign> was the station call used.  Since 
<callsign> is usually the same, this led to files accidentally overwritten 
and occasionally the wrong file would get submitted.  Some time back we 
queried the user base and the prevailing opinion was to use the .QDF base 
filename instead, even though this requires the user to rename the file 
prior to submittal.

Dave/K8CC


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>