I doubt that the presence or absence of hams would have made any
difference. It is the UPLC members who have not reported interference.
This is not the same as reporting that there was no interference. Of
course they haven't reported any interference. Why would they? I can
just see it. Conscientious engineer says, "Hey Boss, this stuff
radiates all kinds of interference." Boss says, "I'll take care of the
problem," and tosses the report into the garbage. Sr. Manager says to
Boss, "Are you going to report any interference problems?" Boss,
knowing how hard it is to find jobs in the hi-tech industry says, "Hell,
no." If you've worked in middle management I'm sure you'll recognize
this little scenario.
73 and good luck with this guys,
Jim Smith VE7FO
EDWARDS, EDDIE J wrote:
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jimk8mr@aol.com
>at page 9, includes a real whopper: "The UPLC is pleased to respond
>that
>there has been no interference reported in any of the field trials by
>its
>members."
>
>
>They must've found some small towns to do these tests in that had no ham
>population!
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>RFI mailing list
>RFI@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
|